CS6140 Machine Learning

HW6 - SVM and Kernels

Make sure you check the syllabus for the due date.




PROBLEM 1 SVM library [40 points]

A)  Run an SVM from a package or library of your choice on the Spambase dataset. Try several kernels, including the polynomial and the RBF ones. Report the results. Use one of these packages: SVMlight, SGDSVM, osu SVMLIBSVM, Matlab SVMtrain,  or other software  (here, here). 

B) Run an SVM from a package or library of your choice on the Digits Dataset (Training data, labels.  Testing data, labels). Use your extracted HAAR features from HW5. If you choose an SVM packge that does not provide multi-class implementations, you should write a wrapper that will make the code run for each class versus the others, separately.

PROBLEM 2 Implement your own SVM with SMO solver for Spambase [50 points]

 Instead of using a SVM package, implement your own using SMO optimization and run on Spambase dataset with k-folds cross validation. Compare with Problem 1 results. Here is an SMO article, and a SMO simplified version .


PROBLEM 3 Implement your own SVM with SMO solver for Digit Dataset [70 points]

 Instead of using a SVM package, implement your own using SMO optimization and run it on the Digits Dataset (Training data, labels.  Testing data, labels) with HAAR features extracted on HW5. Compare with Problem 1 results. The Digits dataset is very learnable, so to speed up the computation you can sample the training set at 10% or 20% per class (but make sure to use the entire testing set for measuring performance).
If you did not extract HAAR Features for HW5, you can use our version of MNIST_HAAR_dataset
    Since the data has a range of 10 labels (multiclass) while your SVM is a binary classifier,  you will have to implement a wrapper on top of the SVM. You can choose one of the following:

PROBLEM 4 [GR only ]

Explain why 0 α C/m  is a constraint in the dual optimization with slack variables. (HINT: read Chris Burges tutorial first) Distinguish three cases, and explain them in terms of the classification and constraints: a) 0 = α ; b) 0 < α< C/m; c) α = C/m. 

This has been discussed in class and in SVM notes; a detailed rigurous explanation is expected.


PROBLEM 5 k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN)

Implement the kNN classification algorithm such that it can work with different distance functions (or kernels as similarities)

A optional) Fix values of ‘k’= "the number of closest neighbors used", i.e.  k=1,k=3, and k=7.  
  • Spambase dataset. Try k=1,3,7 with Euclidian distance.
  • Digits Dataset, with extracted features. Try k=1,3,7 and the following similarities/distances: Cosine distance, Gaussian Kernel, Polynomial degree-2 Kernel
  • B optional) Fixed Window. Instead of using the closest k Neighbors, now we are going to use all neighbors within a window. It should be clear that a testpoint z1 might have many neighbors (a dense area) in its window, while another testpoint z2 might have only (a sparse area) or none at all. 
    Fix an appropriate window size around the test datapoint by defining a windows "radius" R , or the maximum distance allowed. Predict the label as the majority or average of training neighbors within the window.


    C required) Kernel density estimation. Separately for each label class, estimate P(z|C) using the density estimator given by the kernel K restricted to the training points form class C. There is no need for physical windows, as the kernel is weighting each point by similarity:

    where mC is the number of points in the training set with label C. Then predict the class by largest Bayesian probabilities P(C|z) = P(C) * P(z|C) /P(z).


    PROBLEM 6 [optional, no credit]

    Consider the following 6 points in 2D, for two classes:

    class 0:   (1,1)   (2,2)    (2,0)

    class 1:   (0,0)   (1,0)    (0,1)

    a) Plot these 6 points, construct the optimal hyperplane by inspection and intuition (give the W,b) and calculate the margin.

    b) Which points are support vectors ?

    c) [Extra Credit] Construct the hyperplane by solving the dual optimization problem using the Lagrangian. Compare with part (a).


    PROBLEM 7 Implement better  SMO [optional, no credit]

    Extra points will be given for an SMO implementation for both PB2 and PB3 that is reasonable fast.
    Extra points will be given for an implementation for both PB2 and PB3 that works with kernels (for example Gaussian Kernel)


    PROBLEM 8 [optional, no credit]

    Run your SMO-SVM on other datasets.


    PROBLEM 9 [Extra Credit]

    Same problem as 2, but dont use SMO. Instead use a built in  (or existing library) quadratic solver from Matlab, Python, Java, C etc, inn order to solve the dual problem.


    PROBLEM 10 [optional, no credit]

    What is the VC dimension of the SVM with linear kernel ?