Subject: [CSG111] CSG111 MP5: Question about extending let statements
From: Zach Kissel (zach.kissel@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Mar 03 2006 - 21:37:01 EST
Hi All,
For the second question it seems to me that in order for the
let-exp to have multiple arguements is to modify the let we have now
because the grammar will become ambiguous if we create a new let
expression. I'm assuming we should be modifying the let-exp and
proc-exp is this assumption correct?
-Zach
-- No trees were harmed in the creation of this e-mail. However, a few electrons were disturbed._______________________________________________ csg111 mailing list csg111@lists.ccs.neu.edu https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/csg111
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Mar 15 2007 - 15:00:09 EDT